Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Garner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Genesee; Wisner, J. Garnishment proceedings by George W. Hubbard against Bert M. Garner, as garnishee of John Chapman. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action originated in justice’s court. It is sought to subject to process of garnishment money belonging to the principal defendant, John Chapman, which was at the time of the service of the process in the hands of the garnishee defendant, Garner. The facts, as found by the circuit judge, are that the defendant Chapman was arrested by the city marshal for a misdemeanor, and taken to the county jail for detention; that Garner was the jailer in charge; that Chapman was searched by the marshal in the presence of Garner, and $209.41 in money taken, and turned over to Garner for safe-keeping.

Th…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trudo v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Dahms v. SearsOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Newberry v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Commercial Exchange Bank v. McLeodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  5. Haines v. SaviersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Youman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. People v. . ChiaglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. People v. MargelisMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Kuehn v. FaulknerWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. McDonell v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API