Legal Opinion

Gemberling v. Lazarus

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to St. Joseph. (Loveridge, J.) Submitted on briefs April 12, 1894. Decided May 18, 1894. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This cause was tried before the court without a jury, and no exceptions were taken to any of the rulings of the trial judge; and no written findings of fact or law were requested, and none were made. All the testimony is returned into this Court, and upon which counsel for defendant asks this Court to review the action of the *325trial court. "We have repeatedly declined to do this. If a review is desired in this Court, where a trial has been had before the court below without a jury, written findings of fact and law must be asked for and had, and exceptions taken thereto. The case is ruled by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Township of Cumming v. SchickMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McDonell v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Moore v. Royal Oak Lumber & Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Old Second National Bank v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Rice v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Robson v. DaytonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API