Legal Opinion

Lufkin v. Patten-Blinn Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1936No. Civ. 10557PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

This is an action for damages brought by Ida G. Lufkin against Patten-Blinn Lumber Co., a corporation, and B. W. Dalton, for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when struck by an automobile driven by defendant Dalton while plaintiff was crossing Main Street in the city Of Los Angeles, at or near the intersection of Seventy-eighth Street, on December 15, 1934. The complaint alleged that at the time of the accident the automobile involved therein, which was owned by defendant lumber company, was being driven by defendant Dalton in the scope of his employment. The answer…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Paine v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  4. MacDermot v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. MeyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. People v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API