Legal Opinion

Bone v. Hayes

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1908No. S.F. No. 4534PublishedCited by 55 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This action was begun by Charles Main against Thomas R. Hayes, individually and as executor of the will of C. E. Hayes, deceased, to compel the transfer to plaintiff of three hundred shares of the stock of Standard Portland Cement Company, issued to Thomas R. Hayes, and a like number, issued to C. E. Hayes. The cement company was made a party defendant for the purpose of preventing a transfer of the stock pending the litigation.

Plaintiff’s amended complaint contained three counts. The first alleged that on September 29,1902, the defendant Thomas R. Hayes, acting as plaintiff’s agent purchased…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Moody v. PeiranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Green v. DuvergeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  5. New York and Brooklyn Ferry Company v. . MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. People v. RuefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Manney v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Pens. Plan Guide P 23918h Linda Ramsey v. Hercules Incorporated and Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API