Legal Opinion

Paine v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1904No. L.A. No. 1443PublishedCited by 48 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Frank F. Oster, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON, C.

The plaintiffs are husband and wife, and brought this action to recover damages from the defendant for a personal injury sustained by the wife by reason of the negligence of the defendant. The ease was tried by the court without a jury, and findings and judgment were given in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendant has appealed from the judgment upon the ground that it is not sustained by the findings, bringing the appeal here upon the judgment-roll without, any bill of exceptions.

The plaintiffs were driving in a buggy in the city of San Bernardino, along G Street, in a northerly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. McFadden v. Santa Ana, Orange, & Tustin Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Gould v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Lamb v. HarbaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. People's Home Savings Bank v. RickardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Arundel v. TurkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Greenfield v. BruskasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Basler v. Sacramento Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Rutledge v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API