MacDermot v. Hayes
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Grant & Zimdars, William H. Bryan, and Geo. W. Towle, for Appellants and Respondents Louis M. MacDermot et al. Charles W. Slack, for Appellants and Respondents Mary E. Hayes, as Executrix, etc., et al. Morrison, Dunne & Brobeck, for Appellant and Respondent Standard Portland Cement Company. W. H. Smith, Jr., for Appellant and Respondent L. F. Young.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment so far as it is against their claim set forth in the complaint, and the defendants Standard Portland Cement Company and cross-defendant L. F. Young each appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. By stipulation, all the appeals are presented on one transcript of the record. The plaintiffs’ appeal is numbered 7126 and those of said defendants are numbered 7298 on the register of this court.
The action was begun on March 29, 1904, Charles Main being the original plaintiff and Thomas R. Hayes, individually and as executor…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Bell v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Bourquin v. BourquinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Ralston v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Thompson v. TolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Arundel v. TurkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Bernhard v. WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.