Reay v. Butler
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an action of ejectment, and was commenced by plaintiff on February 20, 1866, in the former district court of the fifteenth judicial district, against John Butler and P. H. Owens, who were the only persons named as defendants. In the complaint it is averred that on the first day of January, 1863, *212plaintiff was “ seised and possessed ” of certain described land, situate in the city and county of San Francisco; and that on said first day of January, 1863, the defendants (Butler and Owens) wrongfully entered upon said land, “ and ousted and ejected plaintiff therefrom, and ever since have…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson v. AtkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Bauder v. TyrrelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Dobinson v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wilson v. Cross & Co.California Supreme Court · 1867
- Altschul v. DoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Spreckels v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Crisman v. LantermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Reay v. HeazeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Priest v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.