People v. Campbell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
KINCAID, J. pro tem.
Appeal is taken by the defendant from the judgment and the order of the trial court denying his motion for a new trial following his conviction after trial by court of the offense of violation of section 288 of the Penal Code. No judgment was pronounced and probation was granted. The order appealed from and the judgment of conviction are attacked solely on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence based upon the contention that the testimony of the complaining witness, a 9-year-old girl, is inherently improbable and not entitled to the credence necessary to uphold…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hicks v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Back v. FarnsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. GoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. RumleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. ShowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.