People v. Huston
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
— The appellant was convicted of violating section 288 of the Penal Code upon a trial which followed the reversal of a similar judgment of conviction for the same offense. (People v. Huston, 45 Cal.App.2d 596 [114 P.2d 607].) He has again appealed from the judgment and also from an order denying his motion for a new -trial.
The complaining witness, an eleven year old girl, was one of a number of children who attended parties given by Hus ton. At these parties games were played which required the loser to kiss him as a forfeit. He had written notes to the complainant and received notes from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hicks v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Back v. FarnsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. CudjoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.