Legal Opinion

People v. Huston

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1943No. Crim. 4439PublishedCited by 191 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

— The appellant was convicted of violating section 288 of the Penal Code upon a trial which followed the reversal of a similar judgment of conviction for the same offense. (People v. Huston, 45 Cal.App.2d 596 [114 P.2d 607].) He has again appealed from the judgment and also from an order denying his motion for a new -trial.

The complaining witness, an eleven year old girl, was one of a number of children who attended parties given by Hus ton. At these parties games were played which required the loser to kiss him as a forfeit. He had written notes to the complainant and received notes from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hicks v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Back v. FarnsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by191 opinions

  1. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. CudjoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API