Cooper v. State

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[11] Cleo Cooper (the appellant) appeals from the district court's denial of a motion to correct an illegal sentence, in which the district court clarified its intent that the appellant's sentence was to run consecutive to other sentences. Finding that review of the appellant's claim is barred by the doctrine of res judicata, we will affirm the district court's decision.

ISSUE

[12] Did the district court err when it denied the appellant's motion to correct an illegal sentence and instead clarified that the appellant's sentence was to be served consecutive to his other…