Legal Opinion

Steven David Lunden v. The State of Wyoming

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2013No. S-12-0145PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[11] The appellant, Steven David Lun-den, appeals the district court's denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence. On appeal, he claims that the judgment and sentence entered after he pled guilty to misuse of a credit card and forgery are illegal because he was not advised that his guilty pleas may result in the disqualification of his right to possess firearms pursuant to federal law. We affirm.

ISSUE

Did the district court err when it denied the appellant's motion to correct an illegal sentence?

FACTS

[13] On May 7, 2010, the appellant pled guilty to one count of unlawful…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lacey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Harlow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Taylor v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Moore v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Goetzel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Joel Randy Ferguson v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Christopher D. Balderson v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Goetzel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Cameron Curtis HagenWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API