Legal Opinion

Lacey v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2003No. 03-7PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[T1] In 2002, more than ten years after being convicted and sentenced for kidnapping and two counts of aggravated assault, Kevin Lacey filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence in district court. The district court denied his motion on the basis that no showing was made pursuant to W.R.Cr.P. 35(a). This Court must decide whether Mr. Lacey's claims are barred by the doctrine of res judicata given that he challenged his sentences previously in his direct appeal. We affirm.

ISSUES

[12] The first issue as presented by the Appellee is dispositive:

Issue I: Whether appellant's…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Kallas v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Griswold v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Markstein v. Countryside I, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Mead v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  2. McDaniel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Dolence v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Amin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. DeLoge v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API