Legal Opinion

Matthew C. Kurtenbach v. The State of Wyoming

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2013No. S-13-0022PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[T1] The appellant, Matthew C. Kurten-bach, appeals the district court's denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Finding that the appellant's claims are barred by the doctrine of res judicata, we affirm the district court's order.

ISSUE

[T2] Did the district court abuse its discretion when it denied the appellant's motion to correct an illegal sentence?

FACTS

[13] The facts underlying the appellant's conviction and the issues regarding his subsequent difficulties in his incarceration have been discussed in detail in Kurtenbach v. State, 2008 WY 109, 192 P.3d 973…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lacey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. McCarty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Dolence v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Amin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goetzel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Joel Randy Ferguson v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Kenneth Dale Nicodemus v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Brittany Leanne Poignee v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Goetzel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API