Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 2007No. 06-283PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANFILL, District Judge.

[T1] Mr. McDaniel appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. He claims his sentences should have merged and run concurrently instead of consecutively. We affirm.

ISSUES

We state the issue for review as follows:

Did the District Court properly deny Appellant's motion to correct an illegal sentence?

FACTS

On June 27, 1996, Mr. McDaniel was convicted by a jury of two counts of first degree sexual assault for forcing both vaginal and anal intercourse upon the same victim. The assaults were separated in time by only a matter of minutes or seconds. On…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Baum v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ryan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Padilla v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hamill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Bilderback v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  2. DAX v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Joel Randy Ferguson v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Joseph Newton Best v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API