Mead v. State

THOMAS, Justice.

Richard Mead (Mead), representing himself, claims plain error in the revocation of his probation by the district court. In the district court, Mead sought relief by a Motion for Correction [of an} Illegal Sentence, relying on W.R.Cr.P. 35(a). Mead failed, however, to present the district court with any claim of illegality in. his sentence. In due course, the district court entered an order denying Mead's motion. Three days later, Mead filed a Motion for Sentence Reduction, relying on W.R.Cr.P. 35(b). The same day, the district court entered an Order Denying Reduction of…