Legal Opinion

McCarty v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1996No. 95-292PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

Appellant seeks review of the district court’s denial of his motion to correct his sentence after revoking probation. The district court held that the issue was res judica-ta.

We affirm.

The parties to this appeal state a single issue:

Did the district court properly deny appellant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence?

We have already addressed the procedural and factual background pertinent to this appeal in McCarty v. State, 883 P.2d 367, 370-71 (Wyo.1994). In summary, appellant entered a guilty plea to the reckless endangerment of one victim and to aggravated assault…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pote v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. McCarty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Wright v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Lacey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. McDaniel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. John Leslie ChapmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Dolence v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API