Brittany Leanne Poignee v. State

KAUTZ, Justice.

[T1] Brittany Leanne Poignee appeals the district court's order revoking her probation. She does not question the district court's actions at the time of her revocation, but claims she was denied the assistance of counsel when her probation was extended more than a year earlier. We conclude Ms. Poignee's challenge to the probation extension order is barred because she did not appeal it. Consequently, we affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Ms. Poignsee presents the following issue on appeal:

Did the trial court err in revoking [Ms. Poignee's] probation[ ] when [she] had not had the benefit of…