Legal Opinion

Chadwell v. Brown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 19, 1922No. 10676PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNBILL, J.

E. M. Brown and Myrtle Jaco, owners of certain furniture, commenced this action in replevin against William Ohad-well and wife to recover possession of the furniture and for damages for the wrongful detention. A writ of replevin was issued, and the sheriff served the same, and within 24 hours the defendants executed a redelivery bond, and retained possession of the property. The defendant answered the plaintiffs’ petition by filing a general denial.

The material facts are substantially as follows: William Chadwell and wife were the owners of a certain building, and prior to the completion of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gorman v. CarlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. McClintock v. ParishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Sivils v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Brook v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. Haltom v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Nickel v. JandaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. City of Tulsa v. GrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Utility Coal Co. v. RogezSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API