Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Grier
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 16, 1924No. 13029PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
In this case the' defendant in error, Lolrenzo Grier-, brought suit against the plaintiff in error, the city of Tulsa, -because of alleged damage to' his real property located in the city of Tulsa by reason of the -construction by the city of a sanitary sewer, a storm sewer and an embankment for a street, closing the course of what is alleged to have been a well-defined stream.
The -suit was originally filed May 11, 1917. and sued the city for damage because of negligence in constructing the sanitary sewer and in obstructing the fio'w of water -through its natural course down a ravine, by…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- McCann v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Pahlka v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Parker v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
- Roberts v. MosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kane v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- MATEER T/A SUMMIT HILL RADIO & TV v. Reliance Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- City of Stillwater v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Herwig v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Roberts v. Union Insurance SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.