Legal Opinion

Nickel v. Janda

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1925No. 15407PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

On January 2, 1923, plaintiffs filed their action in the district court of Canadian county against the defendants, wherein plaintiff Mary J. Nickel alleges she is the widow of Francis M. Nickel, deceased; that she was never divorced or legally separated from Francis M. Nickel until his death about May 27, 1914; and the other plaintiffs are the children of Francis M. and Mary J. Nickel, and they entered upon and homesteaded certain lands- in Canadian county in April, 1889, and continued to occupy the lands as a homestead until about October, 1911; that they never acquired any…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Moore v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Denison v. PhippsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Fish v. PoormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. McLaughlin v. YinglingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Skinner Et Ux. v. Scott Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hedges v. HedgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Smith v. Baptist Foundation of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Sullivan v. Buckhorn Ranch PartnershipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. Phelan v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API