Legal Opinion

Brook v. Bayless

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1898PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from the District Court of Kay County; before A. G. C. Bierer, District Judge. Action by Henry T. Bayless and Florence Bayless against Maude Brook to recover possession of certain personal property and for damages for its detention. Judgment for tbe plaintiffs. Defendant below brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Tarsney, J.:

Plaintiff in error held a chattel mortgage, executed by defendants in error, on certain personal property to secure an indebtedness of $113.25. F>y the terms of the mortgage the property was to remain in the possession of the mortgagors until such time as the mortgagee should deem it advisable to take the same into possession. In default of'payment of the debt, or any part thereof, or in case the mortgagors should sell or remove, or attempt to sell or remove, the property or any part thereof from Kay county, O. T., or if the mortgagee at any time considered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ward v. MastersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Clayton v. Crossroads Equipment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Willoughby v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Chadwell v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Thacher v. International Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Wertz v. BarnardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API