Legal Opinion
Wilson Motor Co. v. Dunn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 14, 1928No. 18117PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This cause of action was instituted in replevin in the district court of Caddo county on November 2, 1925, by the Pierce Arrow Finance Corporation, for the recovery of a Pierce Arrow automobile alleged to have been purchased by H. L. Cokes. The petition avers that Cokes executed and delivered to the Pierce Arrow Finance Corporation two mortgage contracts, dated August 14, 1925, in the sum of $5,538; that the property so mortgaged was taken into Tulsa county by Cokes and the mortgage contracts were in said Tulsa county duly recorded; that the said mortgages provided acceleration clauses; that…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Payne v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Farmers' State Bank of Arkansas City v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Long v. ShepardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Porter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Brunswick Corporation v. J & P, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, Lucille Greer and Jack GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Motor Equipment Co. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of CommerceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Benschoter v. First National Bank of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Olds v. HosfordWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.