Legal Opinion

McClintock v. Parish

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 24, 1919No. 8625PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from District Court, Tillman County ; Cham’ Jones, Assigned Judge. Action by Carl Parish against Mattie Me-Clintock and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

This action was brought by Carl Parish against plaintiffs in error on an injunction bond executed in an action by Mattie McClintock against Parish to enjoin him from interfering with her possession of 10 acres of growing wheat. From a judgment in favor of Parish plaintiffs in error appeal.

It is urged the trial court erred: (1) In overruling the general demurrer to plaintiffs’ petition; (2) in the instruction as to the measure of damages; (3) in rendering jiidgment for plaintiff for an attorney’s fee of $25.

It appears from the petition and exhibit attached the temporary injunction was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walton v. DevelingIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Robertson v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Goddard v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Noftzger v. MoffettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Norris v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Probst v. BearmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Davis v. HoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Clark v. Slick Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Bilby v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Chadwell v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API