Legal Opinion
Youngblood v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District
California Supreme Court
Decided September 14, 1961No. L. A. 26339PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
This is an appeal by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District from a judgment for the plaintiff, N. E. Youngblood, in an action for damages due to erosion of a portion of plaintiff’s residential property.
The action was commenced against the city of Los Angeles, Max Rosenberg and Sons and the flood control district. A judgment for the defendants was entered following the granting of a motion for a nonsuit, but on an appeal that judgment was reversed as to the flood control district only, with instruction that the plaintiff be permitted to amend his complaint on retrial. (Youngblood v.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Belair v. Riverside County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.