Holtz v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
Plaintiffs Max and Harry Holtz seek a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco to reinstate certain allegations stricken from their complaint upon motion of defendants San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) and the City and County of San Francisco. Plaintiffs own improved real property fronting on Market Street in San Francisco, and in their first amended complaint in the underlying action they allege that, as a result of the extensive excavation of Market Street undertake® by defendant BART in connection with its…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. TranbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Coulter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Katzberg v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.