Legal Opinion

Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1961No. Sac. 7229PublishedCited by 516 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

— Plaintiff Louisa C. Muskopf was a paying patient in the Corning Memorial Hospital. She and her husband allege that because of the negligence of the hospital staff she fell and further injured the broken hip for which she was being treated. Defendant demurred on the ground that the Corning Hospital District is immune from liability for tort under the rule of Talley v. Northern San Diego County Hospital District, 41 Cal.2d 33 [257 P.2d 22], which held that a hospital district was a state agency exercising a governmental function and as such was immune from tort liability. Defendant’s demurrer…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  3. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by516 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

511 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API