Legal Opinion

Frustuck v. City of Fairfax

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1963No. Civ. 20289PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.

This is an appeal by both parties to this litigation. The defendant, City of Fairfax, hereinafter sometimes referred to as the City, has appealed from the judgment and from the order after judgment for partial satisfaction of judgment and permanent injunction. The plaintiff, Elsie Frustuck, hereinafter sometimes referred to as Frustuck, has appealed from the said order after judgment.

Statement of the Case

The parties to this litigation are generally in accord with the following narrative of facts which are in the record before us. Frustuck owns a parcel of land in the City of Fairfax…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API