Legal Opinion
Belair v. Riverside County Flood Control District
California Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1988No. S001035PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION
When a flood control levee fails to retain waters within its design capacity, are plaintiff property owners who suffer damage from the resultant flooding entitled to recover on a theory of inverse condemnation without showing that the damage was caused by unreasonable conduct on the part of the defendant public entities? We…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Ladas v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Locklin v. City of LafayetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Lovejoy v. AT&T CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Schabarum v. California LegislatureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.