Albers v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J.*
In these four consolidated actions the plaintiffs, on the theory of inverse condemnation, were *254awarded judgments aggregating $5,360,000. The county’s appeals are taken on a clerk’s transcript so that the county cannot and does not contend that the findings are not supported by the evidence. A number of the plaintiffs have also appealed from the judgments. Those appeals will be considered after disposing of the questions raised on the county’s appeals.
The litigation grows out of a major landslide which commenced in 1956, and is still continuing, in the Portuguese Bend area of the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by175 opinions
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- HFH, LTD. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.