Legal Opinion

Bray v. Lowery

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1912No. S.F. No. 5773PublishedCited by 36 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment against him for $5,750, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The action was one for money had and received and grew out of a transaction connected with an attempted conditional sale of three automobiles to plaintiff Bray by defendant Lowery. Plaintiff’s theory of the case was that by the conduct of defendant the contract had ceased to exist and that he was entitled to the return of all of the money paid on the purchase price of the automobiles. Defendant by his answer denied all indebtedness and by cross-complaint demanded judgment for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Cleary v. FolgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hayes v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Darsie v. DarsieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Taliaferro v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API