Legal Opinion
Penziner v. West American Finance Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 2, 1933No. Docket No. 8333PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, J., pro tem.
Three demurrers, special and general in form, were interposed to each of the four counts of the third amended complaint respectively by (1) West American Finance Company (hereinafter called the finance company), (2) Pacific States Savings & Loan Company (hereinafter called the loan company) and (3) R. T. Harper, C. A. Gibson, J. E. Scully and E. W. Milburn jointly and separately. All demurrers were sustained by an order, general in form, which did not specify the ground of the ruling nor grant leave to amend. Two days later a judgment, reciting that the court found the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Mox Incorporated v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Burke v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Blatty v. New York Times Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Schessler v. KeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.