Legal Opinion

Meyer v. State Board of Equalization

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1954No. Sac. 6273PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

H.Meyer and B. Meyer, doing business as H. L. E. Meyer, Jr. and Company, paid retail sales taxes on shipments of coke from an Illinois manufacturer to various consumers in California. In computing the taxes, the Meyers omitted from their calculations of “gross receipts”1 the costs of transporting the coke. Based upon such costs, an assessment for additional taxes was levied by the State Board of Equalization and paid by the Meyers under protest. After exhausting their administrative remedies, they sued for the amount of the protested payment, and the appeal is from a judgment in their favor.

Th…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Ray v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  2. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API