Hayes v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This action was instituted to recover from the county of Los Angeles taxes levied for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1890, and paid upon a delinquent sale of property by the assignors of plaintiff.
According to the averments of the complaint the officers *77assessed certain real property in the county of Los Angeles to the owner thereof, and also assessed the same property for the same fiscal year to one Samuel Stratton. The owner paid the tax levied upon the property. The assessment to Stratton was not paid, and after the usual notice the tax collector of defendant, on the seventh day…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Otsego County Bank v. Board of Supervisors of Otsego CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- People Ex Rel. Conway v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Chapman v. . the City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- In re Estate of BallentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- S. C. V. Peat Fuel Co. v. TuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Stockton Plumbing & Supply Co. v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Brown v. GrimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.