Legal Opinion

Bliss v. California Cooperative Producers

California Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1947No. Sac. 5729PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Judgment was given for plaintiffs against defendants and appellants Shidler, Winchester and Galbreath on three promissory notes of which they were the makers. Their defenses, among others, were fraud and failure of consideration. Plaintiffs are the transferees of the notes, the payee being California Cooperative Producers, a corporation.

The series of events leading up to the execution of the notes had their beginning in 1926. In that year the idea was conceived by Mr. Johnson, president of the Union Construction Company, and a Mr. Campbell, to use the shipping terminal facilities and property…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Cleary v. FolgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Sterling v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Bray v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. FPI Development, Inc. v. NakashimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Coast Bank v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Wal-Noon Corp. v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API