Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County and from an order denying a new trial. J. C. B. Heb-bard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtHehshaw, J.
This action was brought to recover from the corporation defendant moneys paid by plaintiff on a contract for the purchase and sale of a tract of land situated in the then county of Fresno, now in the county of Madera.
Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appeals therefrom and from the order denying its motion for a new trial. The appeal is supported by a bill of exceptions. The facts briefly stated are the following:
On the twenty-first day of February, 1891, the defendant, as party of the first part, entered into a written agreement with the plaintiff, as the party of the second part, whereby…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Hansbrough v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Cleary v. FolgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bagley v. . PeddieNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by234 opinions
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.