Legal Opinion

Cleary v. Folger

California Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1890No. 12843PublishedCited by 60 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

This was an action to recover the sum of nine hundred dollars, alleged to have been received by the defendant for the plaintiff’s use. The court below, upon the evidence offered by the plaintiff, granted the motion of nonsuit made by the defendant. From the judgment thereupon rendered, and an order denying a new trial, this appeal is taken.

The facts of the case are, that the two parties to the action entered into a contract, which is as follows: —

“ This agreement, made and entered into this twenty-second day of August, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grey v. TubbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Bohall v. DillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Maffet v. Oregon & Cal. RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Quatman v. McCrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API