Legal Opinion

Darsie v. Darsie

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1942No. Civ. 13190PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From the portion of a judgment in an interlocutory decree of divorce awarding alimony to plaintiff, defendant appeals.

These are the essential facts:

Plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce from defendant, to which defendant filed an answer and cross-complaint. Subsequently the parties executed a property settlement agreement and stipulated that plaintiff could file an amended complaint and that the clerk of the court be authorized to set the case for trial upon the amended complaint as a default matter.

An amended complaint was filed, the prayer of which read thus :

“WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Horton v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Collins v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Bray v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Lang v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. In Re Marriage of LippelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Scheibe v. ScheibeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API