Legal Opinion

Phillips v. City of Pasadena

California Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1945No. L. A. 19321PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered upon the sustaining of a demurrer.

The complaint alleges that for more than thirty years plaintiff has been the owner of Camp Oak Wilde, a mountain resort operated on land leased from the federal government in the Arroyo Seco Canyon, outside the city limits of Pasadena. The only safe means of ingress and egress to the resort was by a road partly within the limits of defendant city which was used by plaintiff, his patrons and the public generally, except for brief periods when obstructed or damaged by heavy rainfall. In 1938, defendant city…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Kafka v. BozioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Strong v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hassell v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Cushing - Wetmore Co. v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Condemarin v. University HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API