Kafka v. Bozio
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
Plaintiffs appeal herein from a judgment in favor -of the defendant in an action to abate a nuisance and for damages. ' Upon this appeal appellants waive all claims for damages and ask that the action be regarded as solely one for the abatement of a nuisance. Plaintiffs and defendant are owners of adjoining lots in the city of San Francisco, the south line of defendant’s lot forming a pox*tion of the north line of plaintiffs’ lot. Prior to the earthquake and fire of 1906 defendant had erected a five-story building upon his lot upon what is known as a scow foundation, consisting of a scow or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Robinson v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Gillespie v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Meek v. De LatourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Churchill v. BaumannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.