Cushing - Wetmore Co. v. Gray
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
These are appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for five thousand dollars’ damages and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.
1. Counsel for the respective parties differ as to the character of the case made hy the complaint, counsel for plaintiff claiming that the action is one at law for damages for injury to plaintiff’s business, caused by malicious and oppressive conduct of defendants deliberately intended to injure sueh plaintiff and “drive plaintiff out of the field as a competitor with the defendants, ’ ’ while counsel for defendants claim that the action is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. EberleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Brakken v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Williams v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Geurkink v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Phillips v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Danielson v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.