Legal Opinion

Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 1991No. C004771PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

In this case, we consider a variety of issues arising out of claims by owners of real property against parties who leased the property from prior owners and who allegedly contaminated the property with hazardous waste during the leasehold.

Plaintiffs Catherine Holthouse Mangini and Mark Vernon Holthouse, owners of 2,400 acres of land in Sacramento County, filed suit against Aerojet-General Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary Cordova Chemical Company (hereafter collectively defendant), lessees of the property before plaintiffs acquired it, for allegedly contaminating the…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Chubb Custom Insurance Company v. Space Systems/ Loral, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Samuels v. MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hernandez v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API