Legal Opinion

Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1943No. L. A. 18066PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*196TRAYNOR, J.

In 1913, the defendant city of Los Angeles completed its aqueduct to the Owens River Valley and, from 1919 to 1937, diverted into it virtually all the flow of the Owens River, which formerly emptied into Owens Lake, a body of salt water without outlet. As a result the lake dried up and its subsurface became a crystalline cake impregnated with brines containing valuable chemicals. On the shores of the dry lake plaintiff had two plants to which brines pumped from wells on the bed of the lake were piped for the production of soda products. Plaintiff acquired the older of the two…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Standard Oil Company of California v. Clyde A. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Kids' Universe v. In2labsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API