Legal Opinion

Hassell v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1938No. S. F. 15209PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The City and County of San Francisco has been enjoined from constructing above the surface of the ground a public convenience station in Marina Park. The trial court, in effect, found that if the building were constructed in the manner proposed it would be a nuisance. This finding is challenged by the city, which contends that it is not supported by the evidence.

Marina Park is a strip of land about a block wide and five blocks long. It is bordered on the north by San Francisco Bay and on the south by Marina Boulevard, a public street. The respondent owns residential property of substantial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peterson v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Vowinckel v. N. Clark & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. McIntosh v. BrimmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. People v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. City of ReedleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Greater Westchester Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API