Legal Opinion
Remmer v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 21, 1956No. Civ. 16532PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Plaintiffs filed this action against the Glens Falls Indemnity Company claiming that they had incurred a liability for which the company was required to indemnify them under the terms of a policy issued by defendant. The trial court found that the damages involved occurred after the policy was cancelled, and for that reason were not covered by the policy. From a judgment for the defendant plaintiffs appeal.
Plaintiffs own a lot in Contra Costa County. A Mr. and Mrs. Morris own a lot contiguous to that of plaintiffs on the downhill side of plaintiffs’ lot. During the year 1947 the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. Of Wisconsin v. HendrixCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Phillips v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Kafka v. BozioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Berger Bros. Electric Motors, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.