Legal Opinion

Zavatsky v. Stringer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1978No. Nos. 78-76 and 78-241PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeacih, C. J.

The single question presented to this'

•court in case No. 78-76 is whether the order of the deputy administrator of March 20, 1973, allowing the claim for injury to the left elbow, but denying the claim as to the low back and left leg condition, is an order “other than ■a decision as to the extent of disability” within the purview of R. C. 4123.519.1

On the basis that the March 20, 1973, decision accepted, .jurisdiction of the claim by allowing the claim, ordering certain benefits to be paid on it and denying other benefits, the Court of Common Pleas concluded that “the decision of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State ex rel. Campbell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Industrial Commission v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Noggle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Felty v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Bosch v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. StoverOhio Supreme Court · 1987

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API