Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Bosch v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1982No. Nos. 81-1658 and 81-1685PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.
No. 81-1685
1
The threshold question presented in case No. 81-1685 is whether a writ of mandamus would be proper relief in this cause. “In order for a writ of mandamus to issue, this court must find that relator has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and that relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law.” State, ex rel. Heller, v. Miller (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 6, 7 [15 O.O. 3d 3].
R.C. 4123.519 provides, in pertinent part: “[t]he claimant or the employer may appeal a decision of the industrial commission * *…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Heller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Wolfe v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Gassmann v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Johnson v. Timmerman-CooperOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Agee v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. StoverOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- City of North Olmsted v. Eliza Jennings, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- McHenry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.