State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. Stover
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.
The primary issues presented are (1) whether the trial court erred in dismissing appellant’s appeal brought pursuant to R.C. 4123.519 and (2) whether the trial court erred in denying relator-*231appellant’s application for a writ of mandamus. We hold in the negative as to both issues and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
I
R.C. 4123.519 provides in pertinent part: “[t]he claimant or the employer may appeal a decision of the industrial commission * * * in any injury or occupational disease case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability, to the court of common…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Jones Metal Products Co. v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- McHenry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- State ex rel. Seibert v. Richard Cyr, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- State ex rel. AutoZone, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Creative Dimensions Group, Inc. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- Kalhorn v. City of BellevueNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.