State ex rel. Campbell v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
Initially, the propriety of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus in this case must be considered in light of whether appellant has a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1971), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141, 228 N. E. 2d 631; State, ex rel. Harris, v. Haynes (1952), 157 Ohio St. 214, 105 N. E. 2d 53.
R. C. 4123.519 provides for appeal from “* * * a decision of the Industrial Commission in any injury case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability, to the Court of Common Pleas * *
Clear though the above quoted language may have…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Reeves v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- State ex rel. Mansour v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969
3Cited by24 opinions
- State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Felty v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. StoverOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Miller v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.