Legal Opinion

Felty v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1992No. 1991-1710PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This appeal concerns the question of which Industrial Commission decisions may be appealed to the courts of common pleas. R.C. 4123.-519(A) provides that a claimant or an employer “may appeal a decision of the industrial commission or of its staff hearing officer * * * in any injury or occupational disease case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability, to the court of common pleas * * *.” We have interpreted this provision narrowly to mean that “[t]he only decisions reviewable pursuant to R.C. 4123.519 are those decisions involving a claimant’s right to participate or to continue…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State ex rel. Evans v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Cadle v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Grant v. Ohio Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Cole v. Complete Auto Transit, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Alhamarshah v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Benton v. Hamilton County Educational Service CenterOhio Supreme Court · 2009

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API