Legal Opinion

State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1975No. 74-842PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Per curiam

In denying appellant’s request for a writ of mandamus, the Court of Appeals found the issue of causal relationship to be appealable and, therefore, that an adequate remedy existed in the ordinary course of the law.

R. C. 4123.519 provides, in pertinent part:

‘ ‘ The claimant or the employer may appeal a decision of the Industrial Commission in any injury case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability, to the Court of Common Pleas of the county in which the injury was inflicted or in which the contract of employment was made if the injury occurred outside the state. * * * ”

Past…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State ex rel. Mees v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State ex rel. Reed v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State ex rel. Campbell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API